Because the measures and policies of third countries can affect the optimality of the EU’s climate policy framework, this report applies a global perspective when considering the direction climate policies might take through 2050. The report primarily incorporates those 11 non-EU countries into the analysis, which are among the biggest economies and largest emitters in the world and whose climate change policies matter most. The climate policy instruments that are considered within this report include not only carbon markets but also other instruments which aim at mitigating climate change. With regard to the latter, the report includes national energy policy instruments, such as quotas for renewable energies and fossil fuel subsidies, and measures to reduce international transport emissions. After a detailed description of the state of play of these different policy instruments, four policy scenarios through 2050 are developed for each type of instrument. The policy scenarios differ with regard to the level of ambition, policy convergence, and international cooperation. The scenarios developed within this report will form the basis for future macro-economic simulations of the CECILIA2050 research project.
Attachment:
Citation:
Funding:
Year of publication:
Number of pages:
Table of contents:
1 |
Introduction |
6 |
1.1 |
About this report |
6 |
1.2 |
Deviation from description of work |
6 |
2 |
Scenario creation |
8 |
2.1 |
Countries involved |
9 |
2.2 |
Instruments analysed |
9 |
3.2.1 |
Carbon pricing |
10 |
3.2.2 |
Energy policies at the national level |
10 |
3.3.3 |
Climate measures in global sectors 11 |
11 |
2.3 |
Conceptual methodology |
11 |
2.3.1 |
Criteria |
12 |
2.3.2 |
Scenario “landscape” |
14 |
3 |
The Scenarios |
17 |
3.1 |
Countries and Instruments: current state of play |
19 |
3.1.1 |
Carbon pricing state of play |
21 |
|
Carbon markets |
22 |
|
Carbon taxes |
23 |
|
New market mechanisms |
25 |
3.1.2 |
Domestic energy policies state of play |
26 |
|
Renewable energy quotas |
26 |
|
Fossil fuel subsidies |
28 |
3.1.3 |
GHGs from global transport state of play |
29 |
3.2 |
Evolution through 2050 by instrument type for each scenario |
30 |
3.2.1 |
Carbon pricing |
30 |
3.2.1.1 |
Carbon pricing Status quo |
30 |
3.2.1.2 |
Carbon pricing global deal path |
31 |
3.2.1.3 |
Carbon pricing middle-of-the-road |
32 |
3.2.1.4 |
Carbon pricing non-global-deal path |
33 |
3.2.2 |
Domestic policies |
34 |
3.2.2.1 |
Domestic policies status quo |
34 |
3.2.2.2 |
Domestic policies global deal |
35 |
3.2.2.3 |
Domestic policies middle-of-the-road |
35 |
3.2.2.4 |
Domestic policies non-global-deal |
35 |
3.2.3 |
Global sectors |
36 |
3.2.3.1 |
Global sectors status quo |
36 |
3.2.3.2 |
Global sectors global deal scenario |
37 |
3.2.3.3 |
Global sectors middle-of-the-road |
37 |
3.2.3.4 |
Global sectors non-global-deal |
38 |
4 |
Conclusion |
39 |
5 |
References |
41 |